Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Week 13: Protests, Riots, and Civil Unrest

Last week in class, we discussed the topic of riots. Protests, riots and civil disorders are pictured as a group of people fighting against social political problems creating major disturbance within their community. People tend to illustrate riots and protests as deadly brawls. But it is a demonstration fairness and democracy to the public and the government. 

For example, in December of 1977, the Boston Tea Party was when a group of officials refused to fill the shiploads of tea and dumped tons of tea into the harbor. The Tea Party was the culmination of a resistance movement throughout British America against the Tea Act. It was a key even to the growth of the American Revolution, but stands as an event of justice and freedom. 

People tend to characterize riots and protests as an unlawful attack between peaceful civilians fighting for their rights and government security or police. Feelings of 'threat' from riots are especially important, as they have been shown to have powerful effects on public attitudes towards issues such as immigration and diversity. 

In most cases, people that did not associate the riots and protests with specific minority groups felt more prejudiced in their aftermath. After Dr. Matthew Goodwin conducted his research regarding the impact of people feeling threatened or prejudiced on riots, he concluded that that study revealed how threats to security and culture can reduce tolerance in our society.

Monday, April 16, 2012

Week 12: Tapping the Potential of Arts and Culture


During the previous week, we had Scott Tate (who conducts research in the area of community development, and the effects of arts and culture), as a guest. Using communities such as Roanoke and Belfast, Ireland, he discussed how art (including those he termed "marginal") is used to build and heal (in the case of Ireland) communities. Art in whatever form can act as a catalyst for change. The problems in the Ulster region of Ireland cannot be brought to the U.S., but a picture of a graffiti-covered  separating fence can be used to educate Americans on the Irish struggles.

What we make usually defines who we are, which is why the identity of a city is usually  determined by landmarks, which are works of art and are representative of our culture(s). New York City is associated with the Statue of Liberty, Philadelphia with the LOVE sculpture by Robert Indiana, Rio de Janeiro with the Christ the Redeemer statue, etc. Due to the presence of art everywhere we turn, art and culture can become ways to address problems in the society. Problems such as sustainability, transportation, etc. Art becomes an avenue for education like these Arizona art museum exhibits.

New York City, which is to many the art capital of the world, understands the potential of art. It is home to over a hundred museums, galleries and collections, both public and privately-owned. Central Park in NYC is a work of art in itself, and it plays host to several art and cultural events during the year. It dictates the layout of the city to an extent, and one might notice that several of the city's numerous cultural establishments such as the Guggenheim Museum, Metropolitan Museum of Art, the American Museum of Natural History are located close to the park. Works of art attract people, and people attract more people. People attract businesses, and this is what keeps a city alive. In an article published by the American Association of Community Theatre [sic], actual figures were used to indicate the impact of arts on the economy.

-O.I.


Monday, April 9, 2012

Week 11: Shrinking Cities

Our class discussion focused on shrinking cities, the idea of sustainability, and regenerative sustainability. Shrinking cities have common characteristics -- a decline in population and jobs, increasing crime rates and social failures, and a surplus of vacant or abandoned properties. Basically, shrinking cities are too big for the resources they have. The sustainability vision for addressing shrinking cities is a focus on people not just places with a community buy-in and acceptance of a long-term commitment. Beyond this, regenerative sustainability seeks to take the community actions to the next level by using measures designed to reclaim, repurpose, urban greening, and sustainable reuse.

         A Smart City Radio podcast, "Shrinking Cities," provided three viewpoints with a national backstory, but yet demonstrate that shrinking cities are a global issue.  Specifically, the commentator, Carol Coletta interviewed Thorsten Weichman of the Institute of Ecological and Regional Development in Dresden, Germany, Christina Martinez-Fernandez, a Senior Research Fellow at the University of Western Syndney, and Emmanuele Sabot, a Research Fellow at Universite Rennes (France). Each of these experts also plays a role in a global group studying shrinking cities.

         The conversation began with Weichman and a discussion focused on Dresden and other Eastern European cities as shrinking cities. He linked the shrinking phenomenon to the changes occurring after the collapse of the Berlin Wall. Specifically, he attributed the declines to the political change, the change from a state-led economy to a market-driven economy, post-Socialist pressures, and the globalization of markets. He also noted the significant decline in fertility rates as well as the impact of aging on shrinking cities. Weichman described that Dresden, like many other shrinking cities, held a strategy of planning and political focus as one linked to growth versus a more progressive focus on livability. City leaders needed to redefine success as economic productivity versus the size of the population and expanse of real estate. He provided the example of Dresden, a city with economic growth (GDP of 6% annual growth) and a social security system but no job growth (unemployment rate of 15%). He stated the economy is doing well because of the industries there -- microelectronic technology, biotechnology, shipping, and even a VW plant. Weichman stated that while lack of jobs may drive the young away, the brain drain poses more risks. For the future, he states Dresden and other Eastern European cities need to focus on organizing the transformation to more investment in centrified city resources and move away from suburbanization.

         Martinez-Fernandez defined shrinking cities as those experiencing declines in population, jobs, or economic activity. She noted that these occur on a continuum and in cycles and that a city might have these separately or in combination with other declines. Martinez-Fernandez addressed the issue of shrinking cities from a focus on the contextual situation of a city. Using Australia as her examples, she noted four main factors causing declines were: population movement from rural to cities, movement to coastal areas, climate change, and issues related to economics -- industrial decline, manufacturing issues, and fluctuation in minerals for mining cities. She also noted the effect of globalization on these issues. Martinez-Fernandez, noting that the previous four were not controllable factors, then described how innovation was the controllable factor to foster a climate of growth, prosperity, and wealth creation. With innovation, she believes a shrinking city needs to establish networking to provide for the flow of knowledge in a civic minded society. She amplified the need for creating a climate of competition for new knowledge, which leads to innovation. In turn, Martinez-Fernandez believes cities need to change their paradigm focused on growth to one of how the environment provides a full life for its population through city vitality, intellectual drive, and fun drive -- more happy citizens means more equity.

         Sabot discussed her study of the urban decline in the United Kingdom and France and found shrinking cities was not an imminent national issue for either country. The larger cities like London continue to experience a growing population due to immigration from Eastern European countries. She noted these major cities continue to operate from a paradigm of growth as census data over repeated decades indicates shrinkage is actually declining due to immigration factors.  However, Sabot indicated each country experienced shrinking cities at the local and regional levels. Specifically, she noted the decline in traditional manufacturing and industrial cities as they shift to a service industry. Her study also found that a smaller gap scale of shrinkage occurs in France as compared to the UK. She referred to the shrinking of cities in France, mainly in places without universities, as a silent process and states the national government may not yet realize that shrinking cities exist. She addressed the idea that connections matter, both transportation and infrastructure. It is the lack of connections between small villages and the cities that contributes to their decline. Overall, to address the issue of shrinking cities Sabot believes the focus for the future requires public policy to focus on the reaction of the communities towards the policies. To understand the policies, the local community must understand them and their impact -- good for everyone or only a part of the population.

         Overall, the consensus among the three interviewed experts and our class activities is that shrinking is not necessarily a negative. The positive outcomes afforded, especially under regenerative sustainability, ensure a healthy balance between socio and ecological factors in changing communities.


Resource links:

Monday, April 2, 2012

Week 10: Smart Cities

The future of urban development starts with the enterprise of smart cities. According to the class lecture, a smart city is, "hard infrastructure ('physical capital') and the availability and quality of knowledge communication and social infrastructure ('intellectual and social capital')." What this is essentially saying is that a true smart city is where real and virtual worlds converge. While reality brings physical necessity, barriers and restrictions, a virtual world brings freedom and unlimited possibilities. The article, "The Future of the Future: Being smart about smart cities," by Art Murrary, Mark Minewich and Azamat Abdollsev discuss the benefits and obstacles of the development and implementation of smart cities. The benefits that arise form a smart city are endless. The main benefit is the amount of knowledge and information that can supported by a smart city is immense. But with the storing of all this information comes obstacles that have to be overcome.  The first obstacle that must be overcome in order for a smart city to be developed and thrive is the lack of financing. Many investors have eased on committing large amounts of money to the development of smart cities, despite clear evidence of strong sustainability. Smart cities need to be advertised more as a strong financial investment in order for more money to be put into these development processes. Another obstacle rests with the government. Today, "regulatory and organizational structures are woefully outdated and in urgent need of reform." This leads to government incentives to be forced onto special interest groups rather than others. In order to achieve this barrier, future incentive programs must consider the large objectives and benefits of a smart city, such as the creation of a highly intelligent work force. A third obstacle is the industry's problem with bandwidth. Consumer requirements are usually narrowly focused, which leads to "little if any attention given to enabling the flow of knowledge." A smart city would demand more from communication carrier, forcing them to build a knowledge infrastructure supporting the intensive work of knowledge in a virtual environment. A last obstacle of smart cities are the cyber-attacks that could be of result. Although cyber security extension is taking place, attacks can still occur on any system. Special focus would have to go into protection of the smart cities virtual environment to maintain their security from threats. While the promise of smart cities paints an bright and exciting future, these barriers and obstacles prevent the development and implementation from occur  immediately. However, with increased knowledge and study, smart cities can become the future.

http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Column/Future-of-the-Future/The-Future-of-the-Future-Being-smart-about-smart-cities-77848.aspx

Thursday, March 29, 2012

Week 9: Sustainability


This week we talked about sustainable housing.  Sustainability is the act of maintaining how the world is. We depend so much on our natural environment, whether it be directly or indirectly. The most important factor of sustainability is to make sure we have and will continue to have all the natural resources that the world has always provided for us. Suitability affects everything around us including social, economic and environmental factors.  This creates a harmony between humans and wild life.
A guest speaker came to our class and further discussed sustainability. He went into more detail about how to build sustainable houses, Energy Star Home and other green building ratings. One this that seemed very interesting was that in Germany, they are capable of getting and most likely have the same amount of cars as we do in the United States. However, more people in Germany ride their bikes as a mean of transportation than drive their cars. As a result, they are more fuel-efficient.

There are little changes everyone can do to help us sustain our environment. They are cost efficient as well and in the long run, saves you a lot of money. For instance, you can do something as little as changing the type of light bulbs you use.  If you want to make a greater impact, since we’re so dependent on cars for transportation, purchasing hybrid cars would help prevent pollution and climate changes. Small changes can sooner lead to a big difference. 

This is an article talking about how these climate changes such as global warming have a huge negative effect on our well being. These climate changes cause a huge risk for natural disasters. You may think you’re enjoying the warm weather now, but in reality, it is not normal nor is it good for our environment.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-change-poses-disaster-risk-for-most-planet

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Week 8: Transportation Conflicts

In class this week, Ralph Buehler, PhD as an Assistant Professor in Urban Affiars & Planning, lectured us discussing the use and accessibility of public transportation in the United States, as well as overseas. One of his main points of significance is how the United States usage rate of public transportation is below many other countries across the world. Buehler mentions that the lack of biking and side-walk paths is a major part of the issue. But because the most destinations in the United States can only be accessible by an automobile, it generates many different problems for the environment and atmosphere. The dependence on foreign oil and high pollution rates has led to higher gas prices and an increase in greenhouse effects. Even with high gas prices, Americans tend to travel further than Europeans daily and parking is inexpensive and usually available.

This link leads to an article that explains the ten cities with the best public transportation and why. Cities such as Curitiba, Brazil and Hong Kong have highly regarded transit systems and known to have excellent public transpiration systems. Curitiba consists exclusively of buses running on dedicated lanes and remarkably, over 85% of the entire population uses this most of transportation. In Hong Kong, the public transportation system is all but what the residents need in the extremely crowded metropolis. But what these cities have in common that the United States do not is the availability of public transportation.

Sources: http://www.gadling.com/2010/11/04/top-ten-cities-with-best-public-transit-systems/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+weblogsinc%2Fgadling+%28Gadling%29



Sunday, March 11, 2012

Week 7: Exclusive Public Space


William Whyte in his documentary titled "The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces - The Street Corner" focused on why some public spaces are more successful than others. Seven factors were discussed: "sittable spaces", provide seats (not literally), and people will come; street, sun, water, trees, food, and triangulation, which involves visual stimulation with the goal of attracting people to the scene. Providing  several choices in terms of seating even makes the space more successful. At the Seagram Plaza, where seating is in the form of fixed ledges and stairs, people tend to cluster at desirable spots such as the stairs leading up to the building entrance. On the other hand, Paley Park with its movable chairs allows people to find their own niches. 

For me however, the success of public spaces is determined by how much they appeal to the senses. People tend to develop a liking for things they can relate to. This is not a complete deviation from Mr. Whyte's idea, his seven factors can actually be related to the senses. For someone who frequents Paley Park, recalling the space would bring back the smell of food and its imagined taste on the tongue; visions of falling water droplets and refracted sunlight; the distinct, yet unobtrusive sloshing sound of water, and the feel of moisture on the skin at certain times of the year. For public spaces below street level, which Whyte categorized as less successful (with the exception of Rockefeller Plaza), one will notice that  the visual element (street) is missing. When the view is missing, sound loses certain qualities. That's two out of the five senses required to experience a space.

Having said that, are public spaces really intended for everyone? The word "public" might denote everyone, but we are all different with distinct needs. Therefore, we tend to go to places that appeal to us, and this applies to public spaces also. At the Seagram Plaza, biking was not forbidden, but there was a lack of bikers due to the presence of steps. Location, can also be used to screen visitors. Paley Park is tucked between two buildings, the most unlikely place to be associated with the word park. The Seagram Plaza for the most part keeps out tourist just by being away from the touristy areas of NYC. Green Acre restricts the use of cameras. One can conclude that being able to exclude certain people can also make a space successful.


One question I asked myself: Are public spaces becoming less successful in the 21st century as a result of distractions such as technology?

-O.I.